The Biggest Secret Forum
Archive


Rep. Kucinich's HR 2977 Names Chemtrails As An 'Exotic Weapon'

By Lorie Kramer
seektress@ev1.net
1-10-2


After years of denial from government, military, and environmental agencies, the reality of the controversial issue regarding the covert programs known as Chemtrails has been acknowledged.
 
On October 2, 2001 Congressman Dennis Kucinich, Ohio introduced H. R. 2977 during the 1st Session of the 107th Congress of the United States. The "Space Preservation Act of 2001" seeks to "preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benfit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons."
 
In the bill Chemtrails are listed as an "exotic weapons system". Ironically in Section 7 - Definitions. The complete text of the bill may be found at Clifford Carnicom's website, "Chemtrail Crimes and Coverup Documented".
 
The bill also addresses such things as particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation, and mind-control as weapons. All of these areas have been researched and pondered by those investigating chemtrails and working to gain accountability for those programs.
 
They can't have it both ways. Water vapor is not a weapon.
 
This is a call to all those of conscience. This is a time when action is needed. It is time. The lies have gone on long enough. We can tell the Air Force and the Navy and the other agencies involved in this criminal activity, "No, You may NOT own the Weather ...Period!" We may not have another chance.
 
On behalf of the members of Chemtrail Tracking USA, Clifford Carnicom's Board, Chemtrail Central and the many other groups and individuals working diligently to get accountability, we urge your listeners to respond. Contact government and media, demand answers. If not now, when?
 
We know what we see. We did not consent. We want it stopped.
 
To see text of HR 2977:
http://www.carnicom.com/hr2977.htm


Rep Kucinich Rewrites HR 2977 - 'Chemtrails' Disappear

By Lorie Kramer
seektress@ev1.net
1-27-2

The "Space Preservation Act of 2001" originally introduced in the House by Rep. Dennis Kucinich as HR 2977 has been re-written.
 
The new, revised bill, HR 3616, "Space Preservation Act of 2002" was introduced January 23, 2002.
 
Re-writing bills is a common enough practice as a bill goes through the legislative process. However, the differences between HR 2977 and HR 3616 are more than just a few tweaks here or there.
 
By its conspicuous appearance in 2977, the term 'chemtrails' received a form of credibiity within the official government process never seen before...producing the hope that one courageous Representative had finally had the fortitude to take the issue of chemtrails to a level of Congressional scrutiny long overdue.
 
Even though chemtrails are sprayed/deployed in the 2-6 mile high range, and not the 60 mile altitude stated in 2977, the simple fact of their inclusion in Kucinich's 2977 list of weapons systems was deemed a major breakthrough by tens of thousands of citizens and researchers across the country who have been monitoring and investigating the spraying going on in the skies of America for the past three years.
 
In Rep. Kucinich's revised new (some woud say 'emasculated') Bill, HR 3616, there is no longer any mentio whatever of:
 
* chemtrails,
* particle beams
* electromagnetic radiation
* plasmas
* extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation
* or mind-control technologies
 
as weapons systems covered in the measure.
 
In fact, 'Exotic Weapons' - as boldly-stated in HR 2977 - are not even mentioned in HR 3616. So, what happened here? Did someone have a 'friendly chat' with Rep. Kucinich? Did the Congressman inhale a bit too much aluminum during his morning job? Did he look up one day and find himself standing under a big 'X' and feel his knees get a little wobbly?
 
As stated in Kucinich's first version of his "Space Preservation Act of 2001" -
 
"The term 'exotic weapons systems' includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space."
 
Apparently Rep. Kucinich is no longer concerned about the effects of the testing and use of exotic weapons systems on natural ecosystems and living organisms on the planet.
 
Although chemtrails are no longer stated as a weapons system, or even mentioned in HR3616, the question of the components of the RFMP / VTRPE warfare system is raised.
 
HR 3616 states -
 
"To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by prohibiting the basing of weapons in space and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit, and for other purposes."
 
The intent of this passage remains fuzzy. Example: Are Imaging satellites used with the RFMP / VTRPE system broadly defined as part of a weapons system ?
 
HR 3616 further states -
 
"The terms 'space-based weapon' and 'space-based system' mean a device capable of damaging or destroying an object or person by directing a source of energy against that object or person."
 
The word "directing" is clearly the key. Strictly speaking, the RFMP system does, by imaging, provide information to direct a source of energy against that particular object or person
 
HR3616 also says -
 
"4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems."
 
They could say the RFMP is not a weapon - it does not "fire a bullet," but it is part of a weapons system. There are clearly serious issues of definition in Kucinich's new Bill. It is conceivable that the RFMP / VTRPE weapons system may fall in the area covered by HR3616.
 
It remains a mystery as to how the word 'chemtrails' appeared in HR 2977 to begin with. Investigation into that point is ongoing. Who actually is authoring the text of these bills? Why such an emphasis on "exotic weapons" in HR 2977 but then nothing mentioned about them in HR 3616?
 
My call to Rep. Kucinich's Washington office last week was brief. I was told there had been "quite a few" calls regarding HR 2977. I was then told my questions should be directed to the person on the congressman's staff who handled that bill. I was then transfered to that person and received...big surprise...their voice mail service. I left a message with my contact information. No reply has been received to date. I will place a follow-up call again this week. We suggest others do the same.
 
Even though the term 'chemtrails' has been removed from the revised bill, efforts to continue to educate and alert others about the chemtrail issue go on. Many thanks to those who have taken the time to contact their Congressional Representatives, keep it up.
 
We still know what we see. We still didn't consent. We still want it stopped.
 
Lorie Kramer Chem Trail Tracking USA
 
___
 
Space Preservation Act of 2002
(Introduced in the House)
HR 3616 IH
107th CONGRESS
2nd Session
H.R. 3616
 
To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by prohibiting the basing of weapons in space and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit, and for other purposes.
 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 23, 2002
 
Mr. KUCINICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
 
A BILL
 
To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by prohibiting the basing of weapons in space and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit, and for other purposes.
 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
 
This Act may be cited as the 'Space Preservation Act of 2002'.
 
SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF POLICY ON THE PRESERVATION OF PEACE IN SPACE.
 
Congress reaffirms the policy expressed in section 102(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451(a)), stating that it `is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.'.
 
SEC. 3. BAN ON BASING OF WEAPONS IN SPACE AND THE USE OF WEAPONS AGAINST OBJECTS IN SPACE IN ORBIT.
 
The President shall-- (1) implement a ban on space-based weapons of the United States and the use of weapons of the United States to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit; and (2) immediately order the termination of research and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States.
 
SEC. 4. INTERNATIONAL TREATY BANNING SPACE-BASED WEAPONS AND THE USE OF WEAPONS AGAINST OBJECTS IN SPACE IN ORBIT.
 
The President shall direct the United States representatives to the United Nations and other international organizations to immediately work toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing an international treaty banning space-based weapons and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit.
 
SEC. 5. REPORT.
 
The President shall submit to Congress not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 6 months thereafter, a report on--
(1) the implementation of the ban on space-based weapons and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit required by section 3; and
(2) progress toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing the treaty described in section 4.
 
SEC. 6. SPACE-BASED NONWEAPONS ACTIVITIES.
 
Nothing in this Act may be construed as prohibiting the use of funds for--
(1) space exploration;
(2) space research and development;
(3) testing, manufacturing, or production that is not related to space-based weapons or systems; or
(4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems.
 
SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.
 
In this Act:
(1) The term 'space' means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space.
(2) The terms `space-based weapon' and `space-based system' mean a device capable of damaging or destroying an object or person (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by--
 
(A) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object or person;
(B) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object or person;
(C) directing a source of energy against that object or person; or
(D) any other undeveloped means.  
Source: http://www.rense.com/

Posted by: Starglider.


Go back to Archive index.








Reactions

If you wish to send in a reaction, an article, or a picture, you can do that by sending an email to (replace "-a-" by "@").

When you're sending in an article or picture that is not your own, then please mention if you can its source (the original URL, author or organization). This is in order to respect copyright rules and the use of material in light of "fair use".

Please, send picture and text files in their original format. Files with extentions like .doc, .rtf, .zip and .tar will not be opened, and will be deleted automatically. Suspicious URLs will not be visited.

Thanks!




Total amount of visits to this website:




Send this page to a friend!
Click here or on the ET.

If it's not automatically inserted in your message, please copy + paste this URL: www.thebiggestsecret.org .
Send page


FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for by French legislation, in the "Code de la propriété intellectuelle" (partie législative), Première partie, LIVRE Ier, TITRE II, Chapitre II, Article L. 122-5, Alinéa 3 (see http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/WAspad/UnCode?code=CPROINTL.rcv or http://www.celog.fr/cpi/lv1_tt2.htm ). If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


NOTICE SUR L'UTILISATION DES IMAGES ET TEXTES, ET LEURS DROITS D'AUTEUR:
Ce site contient des oeuvres protégées par des droits d'auteur, dont l'utilisation n'a pas dans tous les cas explicitement été permise par le propriétaire de ces droits. Nous rendons ces oeuvres disponibles dans le cadre de nos efforts de faire avancer et progresser la connaissance et compréhension dans les domaines de l'environnement, la politique, les droits de l'homme, l'économie, la démocratie, la science, la justice sociale, etc... Nous estimons que ceci est en parfait accord avec les lois Françaises en vigueur, comme défini dans le "Code de la propriété intellectuelle" (partie législative), Première partie, LIVRE Ier, TITRE II, Chapitre II, Article L. 122-5, Alinéa 3 (voir http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/WAspad/UnCode?code=CPROINTL.rcv ou http://www.celog.fr/cpi/lv1_tt2.htm ). Si vous voulez utiliser des oeuvres protegées par des droits d'auteur pour un but personnel qui dépasse le contexte prévu par la loi, vous devez obtenir pour cela une permission du propriétaire de ces droits.




[ Home NL | Home E | Forum | News | Archive | Photo album | Links ]

www.thebiggestsecret.org


Copyright © 2002 TheBiggestSecret